| Holland et al.’s (2011) investigation shows that even the Vaccine Court acknowledges that vaccines cause the symptoms of autism
Holland, Conte, Krakow, and Colin (2011) discovered 83 instances where the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program in the U.S. awarded compensation to families of children who developed autism as a result of vaccines. Holland et al. (2011) point out that the table of injuries that can be compensated by the VICP includes encephalopathy and the VICP’s definition of encephalopathy is very similar to the DSM-IV definition of autism (p. 495).
In a cruel twist of administrative law, sometimes the Special Masters of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims (aka the Vaccine Court) are willing to grant compensation for vaccine injuries that produce symptoms characteristic of autism so long as the petitioners describe these symptoms as “autism-like” (rather than autism per se) and/or include other co-morbid conditions (Holland et al., 2011). So officially the Court claims that vaccines could not possibly cause autism but in many cases the reality is undeniable.
This was true in the Hannah Poling settlement as well. In the Hannah Poling case (one of the original test cases in the Omnibus Autism Proceedings) the CDC admitted that vaccines cause autism in the presence of an underlying mitochondrial disorder which is the case for a large percentage of people on the spectrum (see discussion of mitochondrial disorders in Handley, 2018).
Hannah’s parents were paid $20 million, Hannah was removed from the Omnibus Autism Proceedings (even though the CDC conceded her test cases) and the other 5,600 plaintiffs were denied compensation. This is an example of the cruel Orwellian doublespeak of our current system.
Next, the internet is changing. In many countries, there’s a coordinated legislative push to effectively outlaw encryption of user uploaded content under the guise of protecting children. Loosen Technology’s Grip on Your Mind – This is a checklist developed to assist people on how to better protect themselves and limit their use.
It’s created in a checklist format so you can knock off one thing at a time. Preserving privacy feels good, and protecting yourself from hacks, setups, entrainment, feels even better.
If you only take the time to do one thing, break up with Google and switch to encrypted email that is private by default. They have a whole suite of products that gives you control of your data.
P.S. Remember when you use ‘free’ alternatives, your privacy and data are the price you pay. |
